Search for: All records

Complex events (CEs) play a crucial role in CPS-IoT applications, enabling high-level decision-making in domains such as smart monitoring and autonomous systems. However, most existing models focus on short-span perception tasks, lacking the long-term reasoning required for CE detection. CEs consist of sequences of short-time atomic events (AEs) governed by spatiotemporal dependencies. Detecting them is difficult due to long, noisy sensor data and the challenge of filtering out irrelevant AEs while capturing meaningful patterns. This work explores CE detection as a case study for CPS-IoT foundation models capable of long-term reasoning. We evaluate three approaches: (1) leveraging large language models (LLMs), (2) employing various neural architectures that learn CE rules from data, and (3) adopting a neurosymbolic approach that integrates neural models with symbolic engines embedding human knowledge. Our results show that the state-space model, Mamba, which belongs to the second category, outperforms all methods in accuracy and generalization to longer, unseen sensor traces. These findings suggest that state-space models could be a strong backbone for CPS-IoT foundation models for long-span reasoning tasks. 

Effective processing, interpretation, and management of sensor data have emerged as a critical component of cyber-physical systems. Traditionally, processing sensor data requires profound theoretical knowledge and proficiency in signal-processing tools. However, recent works show that Large Language Models (LLMs) have promising capabilities in processing sensory data, suggesting their potential as copilots for developing sensing systems. To explore this potential, we construct a comprehensive benchmark, SensorBench, to establish a quantifiable objective. The benchmark incorporates diverse real-world sensor datasets for various tasks. The results show that while LLMs exhibit considerable proficiency in simpler tasks, they face inherent challenges in processing compositional tasks with parameter selections compared to engineering experts. Additionally, we investigate four prompting strategies for sensor processing and show that self-verification can outperform all other baselines in 48% of tasks. Our study provides a comprehensive benchmark and prompting analysis for future developments, paving the way toward an LLM-based sensor processing copilot. 

Real-time cyber-physical systems (CPS) rely on Perception-Cognition-Actuation (PCA) pipelines to enable autonomous observation, decisionmaking, and action execution. Closed-loop PCA systems utilize feedback-driven control to iteratively adapt actions in response to real-time environmental changes whereas open-loop PCA systems execute single actions without iterative feedback. The overall performance of these systems is inherently tied to the models selected for each pipeline component. Recent advancements in neural networks, particularly for perception tasks, have substantially enhanced CPS capabilities but have introduced significant complexity into the PCA pipeline. While traditional research [1] often evaluates perception models in static, controlled settings, it fails to account for the cascading latency and accuracy trade-offs that manifest across interconnected PCA modules in dynamic, real-time applications. Additionally, the proliferation of distributed device-edge-cloud architectures [2] has expanded computational possibilities but introduced new challenges in balancing latency and accuracy with resource constraints. The holistic impact of model selection, deployment platforms, and network conditions on application performance in real-time scenarios remains under-explored. 

Recent advancements in large language models have spurred significant developments in Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs). These models claim great promise in performing zero-shot forecasting without the need for specific training, leveraging the extensive "corpus" of time-series data they have been trained on. Forecasting is crucial in predictive building analytics, presenting substantial untapped potential for TSFMS in this domain. However, time-series data are often domain-specific and governed by diverse factors such as deployment environments, sensor characteristics, sampling rate, and data resolution, which complicates generalizability of these models across different contexts. Thus, while language models benefit from the relative uniformity of text data, TSFMs face challenges in learning from heterogeneous and contextually varied time-series data to ensure accurate and reliable performance in various applications. This paper seeks to understand how recently developed TSFMs perform in the building domain, particularly concerning their generalizability. We benchmark these models on three large datasets related to indoor air temperature and electricity usage. Our results indicate that TSFMs exhibit marginally better performance compared to statistical models on unseen sensing modality and/or patterns. Based on the benchmark results, we also provide insights for improving future TSFMs on building analytics.